|
|
Writs on this Page, and throughout this site, unless otherwise stated,
are typed on 8.5 x 14" paper. The history of legal paper is based on the scientific fact and harmony that if you were to hold up any paper, including
a roll or scroll, the range of
ease of reading, as it relates to eye, hand, and arm extension, that could be read comfortably, does not extend beyond the scope of 14". . 
Posted 31st day of January, 2012 . . Islam Family, . We take this opportunity to remind you all again that the Writs on the ‘Writs of Freedom’
page are intended to serve as beacon lights and examples of expressing the Law. The Writs don’t necessarily
make you ‘Free’. It is your own Comprehension, Mental Status and ability to express the facts
that set you free. The divine lessons that are really at the root of the Moorish Divine and National Movement
of the World, helps a lot and are absolutely necessary. Such as the Circle ‘7’ Holy Koran.
The Noble Prophet Drew Ali is absolutely accurate in the instructions of Chapter 3 – ‘The Unity of
Life’, wherein he emphasizes the issue to “STUDY!, STUDY!, STUDY!, and when you have studied
well and ask what to study next, I would reply study Yourselves”.
. The lesson is impacting because a fact is a little bit
of information is dangerous. It is usually the half-informed who fall into the snares set for fools.
Therefore, we stress again, that the Writs assist you only. They do not necessarily
save you. You save you. If we look again at the Chapter ‘3’ lesson, Noble Drew
Ali stressed the fact, If man would find his Savior he must look within, his name is Self;
and if man were to find his Devil he must look within, his name is Self.
Thus, we honorably ‘state for the record’ we are thankful for any
assistance we may offer in making your life experiences Moor bright, and we urge you to remember in all of your affairs that
every Natural Person is held liable for the Documents they put their Pen on, unless their mental status is that of a 'minor'
who is incompetent. . Islam Family and always remember: “there
is no one that is able to change man from his descent Nature unless his power extends beyond the great God-Allah.”
. These
Writs are for those with a National Mindset and Consciousness. They are made available for Study, Review
and Application. Proper use comes with understanding, overstanding, and the innate power of such understanding and overstanding,
which means you "got it", and you are not wrongfully thinking that paper-work defines you, or who you are; it is
a brief regarding you, who you are, and defines your position regarding a matter. . Being aware that there
may be some who attempt to utilize these Writs, without the understanding, thus may find "they don't seem to
work", as only they will, if you "wear them with honor", and are able to stand on them squarely, upon
any challenge. You must know in your heart what is being stated, as you are stating it, and you will be challenged
spiritually as well. Words have power, and assist in creating your reality. .
The Greater Truth is that there ought to be (more) Organizations, and Aboriginal Law Associations that exercise
the "Protocols Of Liberty". The only true Lawyer, is one who upholds the true and Supreme Law, which
is the Constitution. Thus, one may say they are a Constitutional Lawyer, of which, there essentially is no such thing
because the Rule of Law is derived from the Constitution and is universal. All Law and all authority is derived
from the Constitution. All Judges, and Officers of the Court take an Oath to uphold it and derive their Authority
from it. The Constitution does not list the unalienable birth rights that you are born with, it preserves,
protects and secures them. Governments are in place for the sole reason of protecting and preserving the rights of the
people. Thus, a Lawyer is a "Law-Man" or Lay man. Things are considered simplified
when one says in lay man terms....", meaning in law-man terms. The Law resides with and within you, as you are
the Law. A good question to ask yourself is what is an Attorney-at-Law? It is just
what it states, one who is practicing Law, but is not the Law. Law is common to all, and there is no license
to practice law, or to exercise your Rights. Thus there is no such thing as a Licensed Attorney. The definition
of one who is 'in propria persona' (proper person / natural person), brings forth the truth regarding Attorneys
as follows: In Propria Persona:
In one’s own proper person. It was formerly a rule in pleading that pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be plead
in propria persona, because if pleaded by an Attorney they admit the jurisdiction, as an Attorney is an Officer of the Court,
and he is presumed to plead after having obtained Leave, which admits the jurisdiction.
And there you have it. An Attorney is
a Bounty Hunter with a suit and tie on. He brings you before the Court and Leaves you there.
Thus the Court has Leave (another way of saying they have jurisdiction over you). An Attorney is an Officer
of the Court, thus his obligation is to the Court. To add insult to the injury, or to the corruption, the
Court he is obligated to is a defacto court, a colorable court, operating in Collusion, and in color-of-law. This
is more reason why you cannot utilize an Attorney. An attorney speaks for inanimate objects, corporations, who cannot
speak for themselves. He or she possesses a Bar Association Card, which is a membership card -- it is not
a license, besides a license to practice law does not exist. As well a license is permission to do something
that is otherwise unlawful. Utilizing an Attorney admits you to their Jurisdiction, which is ABSOLUTELY inferior,
they have no jurisdiction over you. They are inferior Courts and as such they possess no delegation of
authority because legislation DOES NOT give administrative courts judicial powers. Boy, have we been duped! Municipal
courts, Administrative Courts, and Officers of such Courts, administrators, Agencies and agents alike, etc., operate under
Color-of-Law, even though they have taken an Oath to uphold the Constitution, and the laws of the United States (USC
Codes). They have created a colorable jurisdiction, as they have no Jurisdiction over the Natural
Person. Colorable persons or fictitious, persons, corporate persons, chattel property, fall up under their colorable
jurisdiction. This is why it is so very important to Declare your Natural Status. Their authority is over
those who are in their Jurisdiction, who subscribe to them, i.e.. Union States (U.S.) Citizens, corporations, those who are
labeled Indian, Negroe, Colored, Black, etc. Thus it is necessary for you to Declare that you are not a corporate
person, nor are you a member of the Union States Society. This is done through the universal process of Nationalization.
First you must be a National, then you can Nationalize or do Inter-national trade, activity, etc. and claim your
inheritance, your lost estate. Declaring your Nationality indicates your natural status and links you back
to the human family and the Family of Nations. . There is a need for people to understand the "Rudder and The
Sextant", which is an explanation of the operations or navigation of protocols and governing principles,
just as the "Great Seal Association" is. These principles must be activated as a group
Association. Dues can be taken, particularly for a "Defense Fund", for anyone who needs to have legal
work performed, i.e., they have been kidnapped, and one (a National) on the outside can speak for them as a friend of the
Court. However, this doesn't mean they are actually a friend of such colorable Courts, which is why one must
be careful in making that statement especially for the record of a colorable, defacto tribunal. This means they
are a friend of Law and Due Process of Law. They can speak for another, however they can never represent another.
They can enter documents into the Court and make Lawful Demands to the Court, on their behalf. That
activity is what Nationhood is. . Writing is "spelling", casting spells, as has been executed
upon the masses for domination and control. (save the physical force), which is cloaked behind the act of making
offers in writing to coerce you towards making a commitment that you don't have to make. This makes the intent
of domination easier. Failing to respond in Law indicates that things stand, because there is no rebuttal,
no response. This is why often you are given 10 days, or so, to respond. . The offers that are
made to you do not have to be accepted by you. However, you must respond to those offers in
writing. Although the written documents you receive, or that are placed before you to sign, may be written with
an air of authority, it does not mean that the agency, association, etc., who wrote them to you, is the authority,
or holds any authority over you. One must prove such authority to you. Upon that proper request for them to prove
their authority, you will find the authority they appear to have, does not exist! .
Writs are a matter of Lawful correspondence. In fact always head everything as an "Affidavit"
-- not a "Motion". A Motion gives them the option to refuse it, as it is in most corporate
or social membership meetings, a Motion needs to be seconded, and if not, it does not stand. You must respond and
correspond in Law, in writing with Affidavits, as in an "Affidavit of Fact", or Affidavit of Truth, then choose
your subheading as it relates to the matter you are dealing with, i.e. "Demand For Dismissal", "Summary
Judgement", "Cause Of Action", "Right Of Action", "Judicial Notice', "Writ In Nature Of
Discovery", (Bill Of Particulars), Name Reclamation", etc. . A Ticket
/ Summons is a Suit against you, you must counter it Lawfully. Although it has been presented unlawfully,
because the person who suis you cannot serve you too, and they certainly can't also be the witness for prosecution.
Many hats a simple police man (policy enforcer) wears while his actions are a violation of separation of powers. By
doing so, he is acting unlawfully in both his professional and personal capacity, and / is acting under the Color-of Office
and Color-Of-Law. Often, particularly regarding traffic, Officers are acting as "Collection Agents, for other
agencies, and are taking action against you for a supposed debt, or "failure to pay" a contract (that doesn't
lawfully exist), usually a surcharge, which in itself is an unlawful impost. Therefore, at the moment of hindering
you from traveling, he is acting as an agent for an agency, and not as a public trustee. This is the game that has been
used against the people to exploit them while also violating their substantive rights. . There is Law
(proper), and there is "Color-of-Law, a semblance of that which is real--yet is not. This they practice
daily upon the masses. There is a Corporate Person, (a corporation), and there is a Natural Person (You).
A Natural Person can be injured, and when injured, remedy exist. In fact ,unless there is an injured party, there
is no violation before the court for you to seek remedy for. You can only either injure a body, injure
property, or breach a contract. Anything outside of that is not an injury and it violates your right to be left alone,
to do as you freely wish, provided you do not violate anyone else's right to the same. Yet, a fictitious person or corporation
cannot be injured. There are two different "Persons" at Law, and you must know the difference and know which
one you are or are not. . A
Corporation is a "Person", (Corporate Person), and then you are a Person (Natural Person). In Law there
is "Civil Liter Mortus" meaning "dead in the eyes of the Law", and there is "In
Full Life" thus one has Rights, which are preserved in Law (Constitution). Start
to utilize the Constitution for your preservation of Rights and your immunities. Get a law dictionary to look up
these terms. You must be conscious of the fact that you are a Natural Person by Nature, not a
branded or labeled Person, such as Negro, Colored, Black, African-American (which is an identification
of two continents), and is a Corporate or fictitious Person. These brands and labels that you may claim,
if that is what you are claiming, are not a part of the human family, thus have no Rights to be preserved for them or
for their posterity. . Your acceptance of assumed authority and policies, as
Law, when they are NOT Law, makes them stand, at least for as long as you do not rebut them, and continue to make
contracts or agreements regarding them. They don't stand just because the agency, corporations, association,
etc. says so --they stand because you say so, by not rebutting, or responding. Therefore you become a
party to them, a party to the fraud. If there is no response from you, it means things stand as they have stated, assumed,
or coerced and put in writing (spelled). Usually you then sign whatever they have put in writing, therefore,
again, you are a party to the fraud. When you do sign something, it is usually under Threat, Duress and
coercion (T.D.C.). Anything done under threat, duress or coercion cannot stand in law. Indicate that with your
signature. If you do not spell it out, put 'T.D.C.' , indication you were under threat, duress and coercion and
that your rights were being violated by force. At a minimum you must put "all rights reserved", so
that you can manage your way out of anything that in fact abrogates your rights, particularly under non-disclosed conditions.
, .
You and I, are not intending to violate anyones policies, however, we are not going to allow any onespolicies
to violate our Rights. This is upheld in the Constitution for the United States, Article VI. They can make statutes,
policies, and ordinances all day long, however if those statutes, policies and ordinances violate the Laws of the
Constitution, they are not with standing (unless you agree they are). . So state your position in
writing, and caste your "spells" well. Know that all contracts are an offer that you may refuse,
counter, deny, or accept, however it must be done in writing -- "The Writ" -- the Spell-ing. . .
 . Motions
vs. Affidavits . It is ultra important to understand that you must head everything you submit in writing with "Affidavit
of Fact", because they can, and they do deny a "Motion", as motions are discretionary
and applicable to colorable courts, ordinances, statutes and codes, but not to LAW. Further it applies to corporate,
or colorable people (negroes, coloreds, blacks,etc.) because it is a discretionary action that can be and usually is denied!
denied! denied! . Note:
As in a meeting, a motion requires a second and can be denied without even being looked at, as these lower courts
often do. An Affidavit of fact cannot lawfully be denied, and must be visited and either answered or rebutted,
otherwise it stands as Truth, or, if it requires an answer by the court, it creates an injunction, and the court
cannot lawfully move forward until answered. If not answered the matter must be dismissed due to lack of due process
of law, lack of prosecution. . The utilization of "Affidavit" MUST BE THE ONLY FORM OF COMMUNICATION with
the Court by a Sovereign or any person acting in a Lawful manner. . NOTE: NOTE: NOTE: Although a Motion is the proper form in a proper Court, as
opposed to Colorable Courts, most people are in fact dealing with and challenging the Jurisdiction of the Inferior
Courts, or COLORABLE Courts, who are NOT acting Lawfully or properly, and because a Motion ADMITS to the Jurisdiction
of the Court, and a Motion is DISCRETIONARY, the Court chooses not to honor the Motion, or not to Second it, thus
it is DENIED. . One must become sufficient enough in Law, and can, and does,
come into the Court with their flags, and fully know that while they could be Amicus Curae (a friend of the
Court, they can't be if the Court is running unlawfully, therefore they must be partial). They can enter
the Court as Consul which is secured in the Constitution as your 'Right to Consul'. (Article III, Section
2 and in Vienna Convention, Article 36), and they are able to set the Court and the proceedings in order, within
the bounds of Law, by their knowledge and their very being there, or Special Appearance (meaning not there to be
adjudicated upon, but only to clear up a matter(s)); then they have reached the goal for all Nationals, as
they ARE THE LAW! They are truly Law Abiding. The point, and the current challenge,
is to know "What Law Is and What Law Is Not". .
. 
1. Judicial Notice And Proclamation
.
2. Name Declaration, Correction And Publication
. WRITS
OF DISCOVERY: In General, a Writ of Discovery
is for the purpose of you asking and obtaining information that they claim they have against you, so you can lawfully
prepare a Case for your Defense. (However, in most of these colorable courts, there is no lawful Case and you
are not a Defendant, but an Alleged Defendant). The Writ of Discovery ask for information and gives a time
frame for them to answer. Their failure to answer is an automatic Default, as well it deprives you of the ability to
defend yourself against their allegations. (Once there is a Default, you must put in a Notice of Default). More
and more we recognize that we are to ENFORCE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND!, and not allow anyone to violate it against us,
as it preserves our Rights of Due Process of Law. .
3. GENERAL Writ Of Discovery
.
3a. Foreclosure Writ of Discovery & Disclosure
.
4. Building Permit
This
prints on 8.5 x11" and is in landscape format.
. Most
of these writs are written by, and compliments of, Sister Anaid El and Brother Taj Tarik Bey as co-editors (unless otherwise noted). .
UPDATE -- UPDATE: 7/17/11 The Following 'Removal To Supreme Court', can be utilized as the 'Suit', and
in replacement of "How To Build A Suit". Upon your review of it, you will see that it is inclusive of all
that is necessary to be stated for the Record. .
Removal To Supreme Court
UPDATE -- UPDATE: 7/17/11 We have replaced Plaintiff with
Petitioner AND, we have replaced at the bottom of the page regarding #8 - 15), "Plaintiff" with Respondent / 'Defendant".
In #8, any Respondents or Defendants, Corporate or Natural, Parties to be found guilty would be listed
as 'Respondents' or; Defendants on 9 thru 15. . The use of Respondent / Defendant is contingent upon whether you are making an initial suit,
or if it is in regards to countering a matter or claim made upon you already, therefore you are a counter claimant and
not ever a defendant. If you were to use 'defendant' you would use 'alleged defendant'. You would then become
the counter claimant because you are countering their claim. If you are making an initial suit, you are the Claimant
(refrain from using Petitioner) and those who would respond to your claim would be Respondents, as you are making
your claim to sui them and they must respond. If you are responding to an existing matter or claim against
you, then they would be the Respondent or Defendant. ..
How To Buld A Suit
Certificate Of Service
. Affidavit of Financial Statement This Writ is to be used whenever you are requested to submit finances for court filings.
Courts attempt to hinder your judicial consitutional rights by requiring a filing fee. However this hinders your due
process of law. The Constitution states ALL debts must be paid with gold or silver. Filing "In
Forma Pauperis" affirms you have no gold or silver in which to pay, and thus relieves these restricting
demands and ensures your contstituional rights to due process. .
5. Affidavit of Financial Statement (In Forma Pauperis)
.
. WHEN YOUR "IN FORMA
PAUPERIS" IS DENIED! The following
Writs are an Answer to the Courts, who have denied your "Informa Pauperis. There are two Writs: a "Writ
Of Error" to the Disrict Court who insists on calling your "Affidavit" a "Motion",
which is "Tampering With Evidence". The Second Writ is a "Writ
In the Nature of Discovery" requesting them to produce their Delegation of Authority higher than
the Supreme Law. Of course, they cannot ever produce it, because there is no authority higher than
the Supreme Law, and that is where their authority is derived. It becomes clear that they are violating the
Law, and their limited authority (Amendment IX). They are acting or performing under "Color-Of-Law",
which is a semblance of that which is real. It is up to You (the People) to ENFORCE THE CONSTITUTION against
anyone who violates it against you. .
5A. Writ Of Error Regarding Denial of In Forma Pauperis
5B. Writ Of Discovery Regarding Denial of In Forma Pauperis
.
6. Records Correction
. Regarding E-Verify This Writ can be used for the following purposes: . 1. If you have
made a name correction at your place of employment, but have not made the correction at the social security, because you do
not wish to utilize social security. The Writ notifies terminatin of your social security. . 2. E-Verify:
If you receive a letter from social security indicating a name mis-match, this letter may also come through your
employer. You need to notify social security with the information contained within this Writ, and send a copy to
your employer for the record. It is already established that one does not have to utilize social security to work on
a job. It is also established by law that social security is not an identification. Therefore to force anyone
to use it, is a violation of their constitutionally secured rights, a violation of law, and is discrimination. .
7. Response To Social Security / E-Verify
.
. Demand for
Default Judgment This Writ is utilized to demand a default
judgment if the court has not responded in a set amount of time. When you submit any "Affidavit
of Fact" it is important to give a time frame for them to respond (just as they do to you). They
must visit the document and show cause and proof of their rebuttal (if any), as an Affidavit of Fact stands as truth unless
proven otherwise. If it is a questionnaire, such as "Bill Of Particulars, or Writ In The Nature Of Discovery",
etc., they must answer it by the amount of time, you have set. If they fail to respond in that set
time, which is usually 10, 20, 30 days, reasonably, they have defaulted. You must follow up with a "Demand
For Default Judgment". .
8. Demand For Default Judgment
.
. Writ of Mandamus -- Enforcing The Law -- Notice
To Higher Court This Writ is used to command the
higher court's enforcement of the lower Court to adhere to the Law. Therefore this is a Writ Of Mandamus. Therefore
be sure to send a copy to the Higher Court, to the State Attorney's Office and the Secretary Of State. Remember
that your Writs are evidence as paper trail of any violations imposed upon you. It is important to send the proper responses
regardless to what the lower says, as it is important that you correspond your position at all times. THe example
below is in regard to the lower court refusing to acknowledge the Default Judgment. .
9. Writ of Mandamus
. CONFUSED ABOUT TAXES? . REGARDING CEASE AND DESIST WITH-HOLDING TAXES , Employers take with-holdings, referred to as
"income taxes" from your payroll check. It is important for you to know that your Salary, or labor compensation
is NOT INCOME. Income is PROFITS from a Capitol investment. Many agree that their labor
compensation or Salary is Income by signing W-2’s and W-4’s. Thus they contract through the
With-Holding Agent (employer), with the IRS (a private corporation).
 . You are contracting with the IRS, via
your Employer, and giving them the authority to continue taking finances from you. To pay, or not pay these
taxes is voluntary, therefore it is YOUR decision. When you violate the contract you made by not terminating
it properly, the IRS threatens to take you to TAX COURT, of which there is no such thing as Tax Court. It is usually an administrative hearing, held in some room or office. Thus,
in actuality they are taking you to “court” for breach of contract. See Book: "Confused About Taxes",
and Book: "How And Why Not To" . Below Is A Letter Submitted To a Payroll Department,
after they were supplied with the W4T form (termination form), and were given a Certification Of Exemption
(non-obligatory) from Federal With-Holdings. The
payroll department, who by the way has no judicial power, nor do they have the authority to make decisions regarding
your personal financial affairs, will often respond asking if the forms you sent in to Cease With-Holdings were Genuine IRS
Forms. These are a matter of "pattern and practice" for them and are intimidation tactics that
are with-no-standing lawfully. The following response has been utilized, and can be utilized by you, compliments
of Auset and Ausar, as they have already demonstrated successfully. ,
. Regarding Validity of Termination Forms Almost undoutbtedly, you willl get resistance from your fellow work mates, even the one who
is in charge of making adjustments to your pay check. Don't take it personally, they are often following through
with their limited instructions, and sometimes there exist a bit of jealousy, as to why YOU don't have to pay taxes, and they
do. Their capacity is limited and they are not used to the request, and the employer gets tax
kick-backs, as well as interest quarterly on the finances collected from your pay check. (that may not be brought out,
admitted, or even discussed, and it doesn't have to be). This is not a fight with your employer. These
are YOUR financial affairs, not theirs. You have not asked them to be your personal financial advisor, only to
make a change regarding your finances, of which they have no real authority to refuse your personal request. Upon asking
them to provide a delegation of authoirty, you will see that this is true. They cannot provide it, becuase they
don't have it. They may talk about policies, however you are talking about Law, of which they are obligated not
to break the law. Do not engage using email correspondence. Be sure to utilize the mail, certified return
receipt requested. Also be sure to send a carbon copy to whoever is over the department, over the person who
has the title to handle your request, and be sure to request in writing, a copy of your correspondence to be placed into
your employee file. . . .
10. To Employer Regarding Validity Of Termination Forms
..
.
Back To Top Of page
|
